Learn more about my book: Stoic Self Confidence, on sale now.
Category: Leadership
Most advice about holding people accountable quickly moves to progressive guidance. Set the expectation, document the gap, escalate to discipline. The mechanics are not wrong. They are just second, and when a leader reaches for them first they usually do not work.
They don’t work because accountability is not perceived the same way by everyone. The same conversation, using the same words, can be help for one employee and a threat for another. The difference is whether that employee trusts me, and that needs to happen long before I sit down with potential progressive discipline.
If they do not trust me, accountability is not a correction. It is the first step in getting rid of them, and that is how they will hear it no matter how carefully I say it. Once someone believes I am building a case, nothing useful happens after that. They stop listening for what needs to change and start thinking about their defense.
Most of the data reviewed in healthcare operations meetings is historical. The reports look current because they were just printed, but the outcomes they describe were already determined days, weeks, or months before anyone sat down to discuss them. That is the nature of lagging data, and it is how most organizations are running.
I have sat in those meetings. Everyone is looking at the same numbers, agreeing on the same trends, and calling it management. What it actually is, most of the time, is documentation.
The financial pressure in healthcare right now is not a temporary condition. Margins are thinner than they have been in years, the scrutiny on every cost center is sharper, and the departments that cannot tell their story in the language of finance are finding themselves on the wrong side of the budget conversation.
The departments that hold their ground are not always the ones with the best outcomes. They are the ones with the best data, and there is a real difference between those two things.
Most people think the hardship is the thing that happened to them. It is not. The hardship that does the most damage is the one that comes second. The first wave arrives uninvited. You do not choose it. It lands, and you absorb it. As brutal as it is, it has an end. Time helps, support helps, resilience helps, and you get through it. The second wave is different. It does not come from the outside. It comes from inside. It is the story you tell yourself about what happened and why.
Reactive versus Strategic Thinking. The choice is yours.
A certified supervisor does not just know more. She sees differently. She asks better questions. She holds a higher standard because she understands why the standard exists. She becomes someone her staff trusts not just because she is their supervisor, but because she has earned it.
When you track room clean times by employee over several months, patterns emerge. Some staff are significantly faster on discharge cleans. Others are more thorough on isolation terminal cleans. Some perform better on busy units. Others thrive in the quieter early morning hours.
Room clean times. Privacy curtain changes. ED terminal cleans. Supply costs. Labor costs. Attendance patterns. Discharge response times. If it happens in my department, I want a number attached to it. That is not obsession. That is how you lead a department that nobody in hospital administration fully understands until something goes wrong.
The buttermilk problem in EVS leadership looks like this: a supervisor spends the same amount of time and attention on the employee who does the minimum as on the one who quietly exceeds expectations every single day. The one who asks the right questions. Who comes in early when the floor is short. Who takes feedback on Tuesday and comes back Thursday doing it better. Who watches how things work and wonders how to make them work better.
The leader who works the floor leads the floor. Physical presence is not a monitoring tactic; it is a profound investment in your team. When you are visible, performance naturally rises because people raise their standards when they know their leader is paying attention. Problems surface as “small issues” before they can mutate into patient complaints or safety incidents. Most importantly, presence communicates a level of support that a memo never could.
To bridge the gap between high-level strategy and frontline execution, leaders must master these five lessons from the floor.
In the first post in this series, I laid out four variables that drive smart disinfectant selection: microbial targets, contact time, chemistry, and EPA registration. Each one deserves a deeper look. This post focuses on the first and most foundational: knowing exactly which organisms you are targeting and why that determines which disinfectant belongs in your team’s hands.